By: Abdulaziz Al-Anjeri

Founder and CEO 

Reconnaissance Research 

The truth in the Middle East has often become a casualty of geopolitical agendas. Firstly, consider the accusation linking Hamas with ISIS, a narrative pushed without substantial evidence yet readily accepted in Western discourse. This claim ignores the profound ideological and strategic differences between Hamas and ISIS. The lack of critical scrutiny by Western media to Israeli narratives starkly contrasts with the rigorous proof required from the Palestinian sides.

This pattern of selective skepticism casts a shadow over perceptions of Iran’s role in regional conflicts too. Iran’s involvement in Ukraine and Yemen, for instance, is frequently presented in a monolithic light, opting for a convenient scapegoat that aligns with broader geopolitical interests.

Historically, the West, including the US, has championed the ideals of peace, reconciliation, and inclusivity. Yet, when these principles materialize through Saudi Arabia’s engagement with Iran, an initiative leading towards potential regional peace with China as the mediator, the reaction is less than celebratory. This lukewarm response, borders on the ironic. Isn’t it peculiar for the West to frown upon such a milestone? This stance starkly contrasts with decades of Western narratives advocating for exactly this kind of diplomatic breakthrough.

Also, social media has played a crucial role in challenging these narratives, providing unfiltered exposure to the realities on the ground. This transparency has fostered resentment among the Arab populace towards the West’s continued bias, especially in its unwavering support for Israel.

This burgeoning resentment is not merely a transient phenomenon but a harbinger of deeper, more enduring implications for international relations. The West’s persistent bias in its portrayal and support for certain narratives—especially those favoring Israel after the October 7 attacks, contrasted with its depiction of Russia and Ukraine—risks fostering an environment ripe with inherited hate and discontent.

In the theater of international politics, the United States’ use of its veto power at the UN to protect Israel from global condemnation stands out. This action contradicts its proclaimed support for international consensus, revealing a selective application of principles when it comes to its Middle Eastern ally, turning international consensus into a flexible guideline rather than a steadfast rule.

In conclusion, the kettle in the Middle East is brewing, and the steam is about to blow out. For the West, the challenge lies in reassessing its narrative on Middle Eastern politics. Engaging rather than isolating, understanding rather than demonizing, may pave the way for more effective and equitable solutions to the enduring conflicts in the Middle East.

(END)